This candid video with Simcha Jacobovici explains why the ossuaries found in the Jesus tomb did not contain the bones of other individuals, as put forth by some experts. Learn about how unique forensic testing enabled Jacobovici to discover the identity of the individuals buried in the Jesus tomb.
Jesus Tomb: Forensic Consistency
In this video clip, Jacobovici examines the link between the Jesus tomb and the James ossuary and how
patina fingerprinting has evolved to reveal forensic consistency between the two tombs, with important implications for the archeological validity of both tombs.
Jesus Tomb: Credibility Criticism
The director of the Jesus tomb, Emmy-award winning Simcha Jacobovici, responds to criticism about his credibility as an investigative journalist. Jacobovici defends the validity of his role in the Jesus tomb findings, based on the facts uncovered by himself and his team and their role as legitimate decoders in presenting a compelling archeological argument.
Jesus Tomb: Handling the Tomb
Jacobovici speaks about what sets his team’s study of the tomb apart from that of experts who previously examined the tomb, including the use of DNA testing and epigraphy to analyze the East Talpiot tomb, as well as the groundbreaking connection established by the team between the names Mariamene and Mary Magdalene.
Jesus Tomb: Conspiracy Theory
Filmmaker Simcha Jacobovici scrutinizes the handling of the original discovery of the Jesus tomb by experts such as the IAA and why he thinks the ossuaries of Jesus and his family have been ignored for so long.
Jesus Tomb: Facts versus Faith
Here, the Jesus family tomb director explains the inscriptions found in the Jesus tomb in Jerusalem and states why the inscription reading “Yeshua bar Yosef” is in fact that of Jesus Christ.
Jesus Tomb: Democraticizing Knowledge
In this video, Jacobovici analyses the importance of the Jesus tomb and its significance in fostering alternative theories about the burial place of Jesus Christ, and how his documentary is a fundamental starting point of archeological discussion.
